Grandparents Gain Visitation Rights Despite Mother's Objection

February 24, 2015, by Law Offices of James V. Sansone

Grandparent.jpgWhat normally happens when two people decide to divorce each other?

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to answer that question: They end up hating each other.

Even worse, they also end up hating their in-laws.

Think about it. Didn't your feelings about your mother-in-law change when you decided to leave your ex-husband? It's normal.

So what happens when your ex-in-laws decide to assert visitation rights as grandparents? Some people resent it.

Other people go so far as to take the case to the state Supreme Court.

Surprise! Your Ex-in-Laws Have Visitation Rights

Take the case Grove vs. Grove, for example.

This divorce case was moving along quite smoothly. The parties agreed to all terms of the divorce, property settlement and custody issues.

The ex-husband even agreed that his ex-wife should have primary physical custody of their child since he had a substance abuse issue for which he was addressing in a residential rehabilitation facility.

However, the ex-husband still had the right to visit his child, a situation that concerned the ex-wife, so she added some conditions.

To address her concerns, the ex-husband's attorney ensured the court that the grandparents would accompany the ex-husband when spending time with the two-year-old.

Can You Demand Support Payments as a Bargaining Tool?

Continue reading "Grandparents Gain Visitation Rights Despite Mother's Objection" »

Getting an Annulment in Santa Rosa California

February 10, 2015, by Law Offices of James V. Sansone

nullcertificate170w170.jpgYou meet the man of your dreams and you fall head over heels in love.

Or you meet a woman who dazzles you and who even your own mother adores.

You decide to tie the knot in a matter of months. Initially, all your interactions are dreamy. But then your spouse shows a side of himself you never would have suspected.

He questions why you returned so late from work today. He demands to be added to all of your bank accounts and investments.

She insists that you add her name to the title of your home and that you make her the executor of your will and the sole beneficiary.

It doesn't take long for you to realize that something is amiss, right?

At this point you are three months into the marriage. What should you do? Get a divorce or proceed with an annulment?

Continue reading "Getting an Annulment in Santa Rosa California" »

Divorce and Taxes: Is Spousal Support a Debt or an Obligation?

February 3, 2015, by Law Offices of James V. Sansone

spousal_support.jpgDivorce and taxes seem to be two inescapable life scenarios for too many people.

Take Texas billionaire Sam Wyly for example. He filed for bankruptcy protection in October but only after a federal jury told him to pay an estimated $400 million in penalties.

His offense was that he'd used offshore trusts to hide his stock trades.

SEC Finds Wealthy Philanthropist Was Hiding Money

Who is this guy? He was a contributor to Republican causes and a charitable donor who made his fortune investing in - and later selling - his interests in two chains: Michaels, the arts-and-crafts stores, and Sterling Software.

Those businesses made him a considerable sum of money. He made even more money when he sold Sterling for $4 billion in 2000 and sold Michaels for $6 billion in 2006.

However, his business dealings weren't, shall we say, always above board. Last May, a Manhattan federal jury found Wyly and the estate of his deceased brother, Charles, guilty of making illegal trades.

The SEC accused Wyly and his brother of recouping an estimated $550 million from at least 700 undisclosed transactions in 40 companies. They then shuffled the money between their Cayman Islands and Dallas accounts.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) didn't take that too well.

Continue reading "Divorce and Taxes: Is Spousal Support a Debt or an Obligation?" »

Divorce Briefs: Tame Your Social Media Use and The Worst States for Divorce

January 27, 2015, by Law Offices of James V. Sansone

facebook-divorces-united-kingdom-2012.jpgThere was an interesting article in Forbes the other day about the increasing importance social media posts play in litigation.

The article pointed to a 2009 case, People v. Franco, in which a jury convicted Franco of vehicular manslaughter with gross negligence.

Threat on Facebook Has Deadly Consequences

In this case, Franco posted on her Facebook page: "If you find me on the freeway and you can keep up I have a really bad habit of racing random people."

The next day, Franco was traveling 75 miles an hour on a freeway when Henry Chavez started to tailgate her. Whenever she changed lanes, he followed her.

Franco testified that she noticed that her speed was increasing so she tapped on her brakes to slow down, ostensibly to avoid getting a ticket. Not expecting her to brake, Chavez veered to avoid a collision with Franco, lost control of his vehicle and died.

This case is a reminder to everyone that what you say on social media, and especially Facebook, can and will be used against you in court.

In fact, what you post on social media can replace the official story you tell a judge in court.

Continue reading "Divorce Briefs: Tame Your Social Media Use and The Worst States for Divorce" »

Family Law News: Billions at Stake in Divorce Case and a Child Lost in Social Services Shuffle

January 20, 2015, by Law Offices of James V. Sansone

Thumbnail image for skd284552sdc.jpgIf your ex-husband offered you a divorce settlement check for $975 million, what would you do?

The majority of divorcing women would probably say "Hallelujah!" all the way to the bank. Right?

Well, that's how billionaires differ from the rest of us. You see, Continental Resources CEO Harold Hamm, whose estimated worth rounds at a cool $8 billion according to Forbes, tried to pay off his ex-wife with a multi-million dollar settlement.

The $1 Billion Divorce Settlement Offer that Wasn't Good Enough

Let's just say that she didn't quite appreciate the offer.

His former wife, Sue Ann Arnall, had been an attorney and former executive at Continental Resources and likely felt that after 25 years of marriage, well, she deserved more.

In November, both she and Hamm appealed the trial court's judgment awarding her $1 billion. She didn't think that $1 billion was enough either; meanwhile Hamm thought it was too much.

This type of disagreement is typical in divorce cases. When tensions are high, it's hard for ex-spouses to agree. Reason seldom dominates.

There's another interesting tidbit about this case. In addition to the as-of-yet undetermined divorce settlement, the CEO has already paid Arnall $20 million over the past two and a half years.

Twenty million is a handsome sum for most women, but not Arnall.

It will be interesting to see what happens in this case in the coming months. Unless the parties can come to an agreement soon, the attorneys will continue to litigate, and the spouses will continue to argue and file appeals.

Continue reading "Family Law News: Billions at Stake in Divorce Case and a Child Lost in Social Services Shuffle" »

Divorcing a Mentally Ill Spouse

January 13, 2015, by Law Offices of James V. Sansone

jack-nicholson.jpgYou meet someone in college, discover your shared interests, and soon a deeper bond develops.

You like the same movies, enjoy hiking together, and love to light up the dance floor with your freestyle, boogie dance moves.

Over time, you decide to get married.

In the early stages of the relationship, you know how to make your spouse laugh or at least bright a smile to his face. You have a child and as you adjust to life with a newborn, something changes.

Marital Bliss Shattered by Mental Illness

Suddenly, your relationship is a struggle. Your husband or maybe your wife suddenly starts to buy camping gear, cosmetics or furniture on a whim.

Whereas once you lived a comfortable life, now your life becomes miserable, and you struggle just to make the mortgage.

What went wrong? For some couples, mental illness can seem to strike suddenly. We tend to miss the small signals until the symptoms become so severe that medical intervention becomes necessary.

Your spouse tries a variety of medications or perhaps sees a series of psychiatrists. You want to make the relationship work for the sake of your child, but you can't do it any longer.

Now all you want is out of the nightmare and an intact childhood for your baby or toddler.

Continue reading "Divorcing a Mentally Ill Spouse" »

Is Your New Year's Resolution to Buy a Home? Consider an FHA Loan

January 6, 2015, by Law Offices of James V. Sansone

Thumbnail image for MW-AY569_smsold_20130124162258_MG.jpgAre you ready to jump into the housing market?

In Sonoma County, the last two years have seen rapid sales and eager buyers. If you're among those who formerly suffered a foreclosure or if you plan to purchase your first home, you may want to consider an FHA Loan.

The Federal Housing Administration's Roots

The government created the Federal Housing Administration in 1934 to help pull the nation out of the Depression and boost homeownership. The FHA accomplished this by making mortgages available to more people.

Back then, the benefits to the FHA program included:

  • lower down payments,
  • qualifying borrowers on their ability to repay the loan (and not on their business connections),
  • establishing an amortization schedule, and
  • allowing for longer loan terms

Continue reading "Is Your New Year's Resolution to Buy a Home? Consider an FHA Loan" »

What Is a Disabled Parent's Child Support Obligation?

December 30, 2014, by Law Offices of James V. Sansone

Child-Support.jpgDivorce is seldom an easy process.

It can be especially painful when you're on disability, and your ex-spouse is unhappy with the sum the court orders you to pay in child support payments.

Melinda and David Daugherty, who live in Napa County, married and had two children. Then they divorced.

David was receiving Social Security disability payments, and his wife and children were receiving derivative Social Security disability payments. These are payments that the Social Security Administration automatically calculate and pay to spouses and children on the theory that disabled parents can't earn a reasonable salary and therefore the children, and in this case the wife, become eligible to receive benefits as well.

Melinda felt that the Napa County Superior Court erred when it didn't include the derivative payments as part of her ex-husband's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation.

She believed that the Social Security benefits that she and her children received should be considered as part of her husband's income. If the court combined derivative payments in addition to David's benefit, his child support payments would be considerably higher.

Melinda thought she had a good case and filed an appeal with the Court of Appeal of the State of California.

The justices didn't agree with her. They quoted prior authority in its affirmation of the trial court's decision and noted that because the children and Melinda were already receiving benefits as a result of David's disability, that the amounts they received should apply as credit to any obligation David had.

Basically, Melinda lost her appeal.

Continue reading "What Is a Disabled Parent's Child Support Obligation?" »

Can My Ex-Wife Move Out of State with Our Child?

December 16, 2014, by Law Offices of James V. Sansone

Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for fatherrelocatingchild.jpgWhat happens when you decide to initiate divorce while your child is still an infant?

In the case of Jason Green and Courtney Parks, the court awarded joint legal custody but - there's always a but, right? - gave the mother primary physical custody and the final say in situations when the parents couldn't reach an agreement.

The court allocated 15 days a year of visitation to Jason.

Unhappy with the ruling, Jason decided to file an appeal. In his appeal, he said that the court erred:

  • in its custody determination,
  • when it stated that Jason needed to refrain from using alcohol before or during his visits, and
  • when it ordered Jason to pay all expenses related to his visits with his daughter, who had moved with her mother to Florida. Jason lived in Alaska, where the couple had lived while they were married

Continue reading "Can My Ex-Wife Move Out of State with Our Child?" »

Elonis Case Tests Boundaries of Social Media Use

December 9, 2014, by Law Offices of James V. Sansone

socialmediaapps.jpgCan you vent anger about your ex-spouse on Facebook, quote song lyrics that appear threatening, and get away with it?

That is the issue before the Supreme Court of the United States.

After Anthony Elonis's wife left him, took their children and secured a restraining order, Elonis decided to share lyrics from an Eminem song on Facebook and direct his post toward his ex-wife.

One interpretation is that he was simply venting his anger. However, his employer decided it didn't want an employee who threatened people on Facebook and fired him.

Four years ago, a jury convicted Elonis of violating 18 U.S.C. Section 875.(c), which criminalizes interstate transmission of communications that threaten to injure another person. (The Facebook post is considered an interstate transmission.)

The jury in that case sentenced Elonis to 44 months of prison and three years probation.

But was Elonis using Eminem lyrics to threaten his wife? Or was he merely expressing his frustration in general? That's what the Supreme Court will need to decide.

Continue reading "Elonis Case Tests Boundaries of Social Media Use" »

Legal Battles Over Same-Sex Marriage Continue

December 2, 2014, by Law Offices of James V. Sansone

Gay Marriage Flags.jpgVictory in the ongoing fight to legalize gay marriage continues to be out of reach for many same-sex couples in the United States.

However, the war is far from over.

And let's not forget to mention that news broke last week that mass murderer Charles Mason received permission to tie the knot with a woman 54 years younger than him. Yes, two, loving, law-abiding adults of the same sex still can't marry in many states but a killer can.

Okay, here's what's been happening.

Federal Appellate Decision Prevents Gay Marriage in Four States

A federal appeals court recently denied same-sex couples the right to many in four states: Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky and Tennessee.

In ruling, the 6th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals wrote that it preferred that the battle for marriage equality take place through the political process rather than the legal system.

Perhaps the high court forgot that in California, ballot measures that allowed gay marriage and then banned gay marriage finally had to get settled in the courts.

As you may recall, California voters enacted Proposition 22 in 2000 to restrict marriage to opposite-sex couples. However, the California Supreme Court declared in 2008 that the provisions of that proposition were contrary to the state constitution.

Gay couples around the state began appearing before court clerks to marry.

Then Proposition 8 surfaced, a new California ballot proposition created by opponents of same-sex marriages. It eventually passed but was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. The country's highest court ruled that the proponents of that initiative lacked sufficient legal standing to defend their case.

In short, gay marriage became legal in California.

Lawyers for representing the appellants in the recent case in Michigan promise to continue fighting through the courts. However, the state's attorney general, an advocate of traditional marriage, believes that the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling will once and for all ban gay marriage.

Continue reading "Legal Battles Over Same-Sex Marriage Continue" »

Charles Manson and the Right to Marry in U.S. Prisons

November 25, 2014, by Law Offices of James V. Sansone

kelly-hanson-pic-itv-image-1-989998856.jpgWill convicted serial killer Charles Manson really get married?

It's hard to tell.

What we do know is that 26-year-old "Star" Afton Elaine Burton, who reportedly has been seeing Manson for nine years, obtained a marriage license in Kings County, California on November 7th.

Burton and Manson have 90 days to decide whether they will indeed tie the proverbial nuptial knot.

Manson's Helter Skelter Holocaust Theory

You may recall that Manson received a death penalty verdict back in 1971 for the 1969 murder of Sharon Tate. Authorities also charged him with the deaths of four guests at his home and the murder of Leno and Rosemary LaBianca.

Manson continues to live because the California Supreme Court lead by Rose Bird, "Rosy and the Supremes", outlawed the death penalty in 1972.

Before the Manson murders occurred, Charles Manson believed that an apocalyptic war would ensue due to racial tensions in the U.S. between blacks and whites.

According to Manson's idea, members of his makeshift family would live in a city beneath Death Valley and emerge at the end of the holocaust blacks would wage on whites. Manson and his followers, or so he thought, would then emerge as post-apocalyptic leaders to rule over African-Americans living in the U.S.

Continue reading "Charles Manson and the Right to Marry in U.S. Prisons" »

Premarital Agreement Disregarded in Divorce Case

November 18, 2014, by Law Offices of James V. Sansone

prenup.jpgInternational marriages, when a divorce follows, can turn into messy divorces with surprising outcomes.

Consider this case. After marrying in the Ukraine in 2004, Richard Villar and Olga moved to Alaska with the woman's daughter, Linda.

As Olga's immigration sponsor, Richard filed an I-864 affidavit agreeing to support his new wife and stepdaughter at 125 percent of the federal poverty threshold.

Five years later, the Villars divorced and the final papers included Richard's support obligation. Then the mother and daughter moved to California where Olga met and married George Nasif that same year.

Sometime that same year, the daughter moved to Louisiana to live with her stepfather Richard under a temporary guardianship agreement.

Life can get messy.

Couple Battles Over Support Payments

Richard, probably feeling that he didn't need to send support payments now that his ex-wife remarried, stopped his payments to Olga during the first eleven months of 2010.

Not happy about the loss of income, Olga decided to file a motion in Alaska to enforce the divorce decree. Richard responded by making several payments.

The matter proceeded to a hearing. The court ruled that Richard's 2010 support payments needed to meet Alaska's federal poverty level, not California's. Furthermore, the court said the support payments should meet a single-person household level.

In the end, the court decided that Richard didn't owe his ex-wife any further payments. Olga filed an appeal; she prevailed, and Richard filed a motion asking the court to reconsider its June 20 order.

In addition, he filed a motion for relief. In other words, Richard asked the court to reconsider its earlier order.

Continue reading "Premarital Agreement Disregarded in Divorce Case" »

When You Risk Losing Your Children, You Need An Experienced Dependency Lawyer

October 28, 2014, by Law Offices of James V. Sansone

article-2310920-0F6A935E00000578-746_634x514.jpgHow far would you go to keep your children? Would you hire an attorney? Would you appeal any decision that separated you from your kids?

The answer is obvious, right? Every parent would do whatever it took to keep their children with them.

What happens to the children who don't receive proper care or enough food and who don't have winter coats or parents who care if they attend school? Should those parents be allowed to keep their children?

These were the issues presented in the case of a couple, Larry M. and Sonia M., who tried to keep their six- and eight-year-old children from ending up in foster care, or even worse, being adopted by another couple.

Continue reading "When You Risk Losing Your Children, You Need An Experienced Dependency Lawyer" »

U.S. Supreme Court Hands Another Win to Gay Marriage Activists

October 21, 2014, by Law Offices of James V. Sansone

usup.jpgThe same-sex marriage battle tipped in the favor of gay and lesbian couples last week.

On October 7, 2014, the Supreme Court refused to hear same-sex marriage decisions appealed from the lower courts.

Those courts had ruled in favor of gay marriage, and state Attorneys General and interest groups had filed appeals, hoping to gain support from the Supreme Court justices to ban same-sex marriage once and for all.

Instead, the Supreme Court's refusal to consider the appeals nullifies those appeals and allows the affected states' to proceed to allow same-sex marriages.

In many of the cases under appeal, the lower courts based their decisions on rights guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution. Those judges had ruled in favor of same-sex marriage because to treat people differently based on sexual orientation is tantamount to being unconstitutional unless there were a compelling government need or argument.

Continue reading "U.S. Supreme Court Hands Another Win to Gay Marriage Activists" »